TestComplete

I use TestComplete on a daily basis. For the last 3 year I have been dogged by compatibility issues, TC browser extensions issues, slowness, freezing. The product can't properly perform object recognition (if button exits then click it, if button does not exist then try.. ) Support and Account managers take a long time to respond to tickets and often the issues are blockers for me. Some of their support engineers are amazing but just take ages to get your issue to them, the phones are hardly ever answered and when they do the person can't address your issue. I find tests have to be run over 100 times to verify the results and work out any bugs to get anything stable enough to run (anything large than unit tests). I frequently get an error and the product stops error says "there has been an error" and gives not details, multiple supports ticket have been raised about this issue and they just say "it works for us" All other feature such as mobile testing (Bitbar) are additional costs - a small free amount would be nice considering the price AM just send out blanket emails to subscribers and any other emails about new products/services without any consideration to if you have the product, have already updated or are listed as the licensing contact - all other users in my licensing group regularly receive and send me the product email they get I am currently investigating alternatives as this products will if not reliable to test my WEB systems

We use TestComplete to automate the regression tests of our products. Since our products are constantly improving and growing we need something that assists us in finding unpredicted bugs and searching bugs in already existing features, so that our release doesn't take that much time just for regression and we can concentrate more on new features. [Therefore] we try to fully automate our regression list in TestComplete.

We use TestComplete to automate testing of Microsoft Office AddIns that are based on .NET and WPF. We use a mix of keyword tests and scripting to create testing suites that can run autonomously and report through various checkpoints (region checkpoints for visuals, OCR checkpoints for text recognition, property checkpoints to verify the expected status of UI elements). The interfacing of scripts and keyword tests can be a hassle, but is still very doable and allows for different levels of expertise to work together. Objects can be found, identified (by their properties), and saved in the name mapping that also allows to then address them under an alias for improved usability. Finding objects is possible both by locating them on-screen or if they are in a lower hierarchy (or you'd like to add mappings for non-visual objects) the object browser is a powerful tool to analyze the whole structure of an application. This provides us with key functionality for our test automation.

We use TestComplete as the test automation tool for our suite Windows Forms applications and modules - over 100 different modules in total. It allows users without an existing test automation background to develop automated test suites and execute those on demand. This leads to increased accuracy and repeatability of our tests while reducing the time it takes to run our regression suites.

TestComplete has been chosen in our Organization to automate the Business Flows performed in IFS (Industrial and Financial Systems) ERP Applications. It will run all the test cases (scenarios) for different modules (Order to Cash, Procurement to Pay, Finance, HR, and many more) in the application and will generate a detailed test report. Manual Intervention is not needed. This has benefited us in terms of Regression and Non-Regression Testing.

UI Testing of MS Office Plugins, which we provide to about 2 Mio Users worldwide. Used in Powerpoint, Excel, Word, and Outlook. Testing covers using Microsoft Office Features as well as windows and functionality of our add-ins. We use picture comparison and value comparison to verify our results. Especially our add-in for Powerpoint charts uses highly customized windows and menus in overlays over the actual Powerpoint charts.

I used TestComplete for 2 of our products. 1. Ours is a read-only CAD tool, where we used the object mapping technique to create the test cases and it worked well for us except for a few of the exceptions where object mapping failed. 2. It is an add-on for the Creo Parametric, where we recognize the features of the object/CAD model.

We are in the Insurance and Travel business. Lots of our web applications are re-developed and re-designed. We decided to evaluate the test automation tools to align with our applications. Most applications are web platforms and Mobile. The whole idea was to use the tools to perform SmokeTest and Functional testing whenever we needed.

We are migrating Manual TestCases to an Automated framework using TestComplete. I am responsible for creating this framework integrating TestComplete with Jenkins and the qTest management tool. Our software is responsible for simulation and is based on C++ with MFC library and for testing. Our main problem with automation is correct create locators and mapping for all of our cases in-app which contains a lot of old code and new approach and [integrating] it with one testing framework

Used for UI testing of our desktop application. Really helpful to check for regression in the hundreds of small features it has, especially when a Unit Test isn't possible, because a lot of GUI logic is needed before launching the business logic. It is also great to know that each window, tab, and popup was checked before release, especially when the test users mainly focus on the new feature of the software.

I used [TestComplete] with ASP software in [the] testing team. It is flexible [and easy to] define our automation framework and scripts according to what we need. I design the test cases based on user scenarios then use TestComplete to execute [and] collect results [that] then generate the reports. It is easy to analyze the issues based on the Testcomplete report.

TestComplete is one of the prominent tools that we use in delivering Software QA Assurance, automating our Functional Tests, Regression Tests & Sanity Tests respectively. As a business, it addresses the complexity of setting up an Automated Test Framework and ensures code quality that supports stability and a positive user experience for Development in tests. We find Test project suites and codes fairly easy to build and maintain and the Test Record & Playback feature ensures we can easily introduce software engineers without prior experience to Test Automation.

We use TestComplete to regression test most of our web, API, and desktop systems. When time allows, we create test cases for specific issues we have fixed before they are implemented in production.

I have worked with TestComplete [on] many projects, which has medical devices interfaces. Hence I have proposed we use TestComplete for the Automation of one of the Biotechnology Medical Device User Interface and that lead to [using] TestComplete with all the projects related to the same domain with a different set of customers. Also, TestComplete provides lots of easy interfaces with other tools like Zephyr(for Test Management), interfaces with customized DLLs via CLR Bridge, and lots of defect management tools, Jenkins, etc. Also, we have extended the TestComplete for automation Qt-based UI application running on Linux Platform using CLR Bridge(This is an awesome feature I have not seen on other Automation tools). TestComplete provides very good support to TestAutomation of Web and Mobile software as well and that too it supports customized XPATHs to identify objects on Web UI, also we can integrate TestComplete with Selenium and other Performance tools as well. And Finally one of the Best Budget Tool with a Competitive Price compare to other Test Automation Tools which supports all that supports in TestComplete(For Ex: HPs UFT, Squish GUI tester). And also lots of languages are supported by TestComplete with good online support.

In a small team like ours, TestComplete replaces the work of several people. We have created several thousand test scenarios in the human-readable Gherkin language. Every night, our build server automatically releases a new version of our desktop application, and then automated tests are run automatically. From the reports that TestComplete generates, we have a constant overview of the proper functioning of the entire program. If it happens that a certain part of our application stops working properly due to the development changes, we know about it the next morning at the latest.

TestComplete is being used to perform software quality assurance checks by IT professionals located on a respective scrum team. The software is currently being used for various core systems and business applications across a variety of technologies enterprise wide. The business problem that it addresses is ensuring code quality that supports a positive the end user experience and stability.

TestComplete is being used in our organization by our QA team to support our custom in-house applications as well as our externally facing web site applications. TestComplete has allowed us to push more reliable code out more quickly giving us the confidence that the development team hasn't broken other areas of our applications. We previously were pushing out changes without knowing that other areas broke since we didn't have the time to manually test everything.

TestComplete can be used fully to automate all desktop, web, and mobile apps across different teams or organizations. Most of the ROI reduces a lot of scripting and time, in order to solve errors and warnings since TestComplete supports AI driven self-healing mechanisms. It also integrates with all the CI/CD tools/bug tracking tools easily.
It has increased speed by delivery (record/playback, reusability of scripts), automation made simpler(manual testers/anybody can use it with no skillset), and delivery of the quality customers want (AI features helps you correct and detect potential issues).

We have 150 different applications that we test using different tools. TestComplete is one of the tools that we are using prominently to test our many applications.

TestComplete is mainly used across our all departments and I would say people are widely using that.

It removes the complexity of using difficult tools like Selenium and no prior programming language knowledge is needed to create or run these tests. We are automating our sanity and regression test suites using Test Complete.

TestComplete is used solely within the Quality department at my organization and is used to test the web application portion of our product. We maintain a bank of test scripts that we developed, and are planning to integrate the execution of the test scripts into our CI/CD pipeline in the near future.

We used TestComplete for automation testing on our web application regression testing daily. We use it for our department application. Mostly we use it as a daily regression test to test each main function of the application [for] most UI functions.

I started using TestComplete about 7 years ago when I was brought into the company to set up a formal software QA process. I had used a few other automation tools in the past but wanted to try a bunch out on the new software. I ended up going with SmartBear as it worked well with the software I was going to test. With TestComplete's modules, I was able to use web and mobile scripts easily. Our sales tools have complex formulas to get pricing, so TestComplete made it easy to do. I pull rates from the DB, use an Excel spreadsheet to store options/data for each scenario to run, calculate the values, then easily compare to what is shown on the screen to verify. Android app was just as easy to use.

For the second set of automation, I created data entry scripts that allow TestComplete to enter business data into our main system 24/7 with the desktop module. This ensures that there's no human error entering and it saves from having a team input data for days on end. Adding TestExecute to a virtual machine means that I can push my TC code there and have any number of users run the data entry scripts at anytime. By adding code to allow the user to pick their Excel sheet of data and which line to start on, I don't ever need to babysit the execution of the automation or make changes to the code on the fly.

This is saving the company time and money that can be invested back into the departments for other things. I have a single development TestComplete license for myself and have numerous TestExecute licenses for anyone to use. The license manager sits on a physical machine that they have access to pull from.

TestComplete is only used by the IT QA department. I use it to automate testing, which increases the amount of tests that are completed in a short period of time.

We use TestComplete in the Quality Assurance department, especially me, as we have a one-seat license to Test our records Management Software. We use TestComplete to do functional testing of our product. It helps during our release cycle to run smoothly and helps us to minimize the manual workload.

TestComplete is our primary automation tool for regression testing